Sisunaga and His Successors
August 20, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
(430-364 B.C.)
Sisunaga had gained respect under the weak successors of Ajatasatru and, probably, became the ruler of Magadha with the consent of the people.
He proved to be a capable ruler and extended the territories of Magadha. He defeated the neighbouring rival state of Avanti, Vatsa and Kosala annexed theri territories to Magadha.
Sisunaga was succeeded by his son Kalasoka or Kakavarna. He made Pataliputra the capital of Magadha.
Kalasoka was murdered because of a palace conspiracy and, probably, his murderer was the founder of Nanda dynasty.
The ten sons of Kalasoka ruled for ten years after him. The princes were allowed to rule nominally for these years to cover the guilt of the murder of their father. But, ultimately, all of them were killed and a new dynasty of kings started its rule over Magadha.
Regarding the first Nanda ruler, there is a difference of opinion. Puranas called him Mohapadma whereas the Mahabodhivamsa gives his name as Ugrasena. Jain-texts describe him as the son of a barber while Puranas say that the founder of the Nanda dynasty was a Sudra.
Mahapadma Nanda according to Puranas destroyed all Kshatriya rulers. The kingdoms of Aikshvakus, Panchalas, Kasis, Haihayas, Kalingas, Asmakas, Kurus, Maithilas, Sursenas etc., were defeated and their territories were annexed to Magadha. Nandas rules over the southern part of Bombay and north-western part of Mysore.
Nandas succeeded in establishing a great empire which covered the greater part of northern India and part of the South. The credit for it goes primarily to the first ruler of this dynasty.
Nine rulers of Nanda dynasty ruled over Magadha. Little is known about the history of Nandas after Mahapadma Nanda except the last ruler, nicknamed Dhana Nanda.
He was a contemporary of Alexander and his empire seems to have extended up to the frontiers of Punjab. He was a powerful king and kept a large army. But he was cruel and miserly. He accumulated fabulous wealth at the expense of his subjects by means of excessive taxation and extractions. Therefore, he was unpopular among his subjects.
Chandra Gupta Maurya, the founder of the Mauryan dynasty took advantage of his unpopularity and succeeded in killing him and captured the throne of Magadha.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Ajatasatru and His Successors
August 19, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
Ajatasatru(493-462 B.C.) continued his father’s policy of expansion through military conquests. First, a fierce struggle started between Magadha and Kosala. Prasenajit’s sister who was the wife of Bimbisara died of grief at the death of her husband. Prasenajit could not tolerate it and asked Ajatasatru to return Kasi which was given in dowry to Bimbisara.
Ajatasatru, refused and thus a protracted war began between Magadha and Kosala. The war remained indecisive for a long time but ultimately Prasenajit agreed to give Kasi to Ajatasatru and also gave his daughter Vajira in marriage to him, which proves that the outcome of war, finally, went in favour of Magadha. Read more
Popularity: 2% [?]
The Factors That Led To Rise of Magadha
August 18, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
The kingdom of Magadha rose to pre-eminence during the period the period of Bimbisara and became the first great empire in India by the time of the Nandas.
Apart from ambitious and powerful rulers, other geographical, economic and cultural factors also contributed to its rise. There were certain permanent factors also which enabled it to rise to to the zenith of political greatness. Read more
Popularity: 3% [?]
Jainism, Buddhism and Hinduism
August 5, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
There are certain similarities and distinction between Brahmanism and Jainism and Buddhism.
Buddha did not give a new divine book to his followers; nor did he condemn any fundamental belief of the Brahmanical religion. The principle of Karma on which Buddhist laid great emphasis was not new.
In the latter Vedic period, the Karma philosophy was explained in DharmaShastra and Sutra literature. ‘Pari Nirvana’ of Buddhists was also not something new. The highest ideal of a follower of the Vedas was to attain Moksha-freedom from birth and death; and this is the highest goal of the Buddhists also.
The eight fold path of the Buddhists contained only those great principle of mortality which were taught by the Vedic Rishis.
Buddhists and Hindus both, in the beginning, had no faith in idol worship.
There were a number of points on which Brahmanism and Buddhism differed radically. In the first instance, Brahmanism believed in and worshipped a number of nature-Gods. Buddhists denied the existence of a personal God. Buddha held that there was a universal law-Dharma which controlled the universe, and this Force of Power could not be bribed by prayers of the votary. It is good deeds and not prayers, and chanting of mantras, performing of sacrifices that can lead to Moksha.
The Buddhist also condemned the cast system, and the Sanskrit language held no sanctity for them. They held that all were born equal and no person could claim any superiority in the sphere of religion, simply by virtue of birth. Good deeds and not birth determine one’s position in the society.
Besides, Buddhism was a missionary religion. It had its Sangha-an organization whose special duty was to carry the message of Buddha to every home. Bhikshus and Bhikshunis devoted all their life to the spreading of the faith.
On the other hand, the Brahmanas had no such organization. They had Sanyasis who were to uplift the people in the sphere of religion; but those Sanyasis were not as organized.
The Buddhists believed in non-violence or Ahimsa. Injury to animals was a great sin.
But Hinduism had no faith in non-violence. The Brahmans performed animal sacrifices to please their Gods. They were materialistic and did not look down upon war. Even their God Indra used to fight against the God of evil, Vratra, who was with holding rain from the people.
Brahmanism and Jainism, too, are fundamentally not different. Both believed in Karma and Moksha. Both lay emphasis on morality. But in matters of detail they have wide differences. The Jains, unlike the Buddhists, do not deny the existence of God altogether. They carry the principle of Ahimsa to extreme. According to Mahavira, even the plants, stones and fire have life and non life is to be destroyed or injured. Brahmanism has no faith in such things.
The Jains hold that death by gradual starvation is a noble thing. The Brahmans consider it a sin. The Jains consider wearing of cloths as something irreligious, but Brahmans do not go to such an extreme.
Popularity: 14% [?]
Tantya Tope-A Hero Of Rebellion Movement
April 16, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · 1 Comment
Tantya Tope (1814 - 1859) is also known as Ram Chandra Pandurang. He was a hero and leader in the Indian rebellion movement of 1857.
Tantya Tope was born in at village Yeola in Maharashtra.He was the only son of Pandurang Rao Tope and his wife Rukhmabai, an important noble at the court of the Maratha Peshwa Baji Rao II.
His father shifted his family with the ill-fated Peshwa to Bithur where his son became the most intimate friend of the Peshwa’s adopted son, Nana Dhondu Pant (known as Nana Sahib) and Maharaja Madhav Singhji. Read more
Popularity: 43% [?]
Vande Matram-National Song of India
April 11, 2008 by Editor · Leave a Comment
The song Vande Mataram, composed in Sanskrit by Bankimchandra Chatterji, was a source of inspiration to the people in their struggle for freedom. It has an equal status with Jana-gana-mana. The first political occasion when it was sung was the 1896 session of the Indian National Congress. The following is the text of its first stanza: Read more
Popularity: 37% [?]
Tryst With Destiny-Independence Speech by Nehru
March 15, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
The speech that marked the advent of Independence.
Popularity: 29% [?]
History of Paintings In India
March 1, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · 2 Comments
The earliest Indian paintings were the rock paintings of pre-historic times, some of them are older than 5500 BC. Carved pillars of Ellora, Maharashtra state present a fine example of Indian paintings, and the colors, mostly various shades of red and orange, were derived from minerals. Read more
Popularity: 40% [?]
Brief Overview of India From Indus Valley Civilzation Onwards
February 9, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
Prior to Indus valley civilization is considered as Stone Age that lasted from 70,000 BC to 3300 BC. Indus Valley Civilization was from3300–1700 BC.
Here is the chronological order after that Read more
Popularity: 16% [?]
Tryst With Destiny-
February 6, 2008 by Arun Pal Singh · Leave a Comment
Tryst with Destiny was a speech made by Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of the Republic of India. The speech was made to the Indian Constituent Assembly, on the eve of India’s independence, towards midnight on August 14, 1947. It focuses on the aspects that transcend India’s history. Read more
Popularity: 16% [?]


